LDI Quarterly Update: 3Q24
Sunset over road

U.S. pension plans’ average funded status deteriorated slightly in 3Q24 to 103.2%, as a decline in the discount rate increased liabilities more than was offset by positive equity returns. In this issue, we take a closer look at the recent disinversion of the yield curve through an LDI lens.

U.S. pension plans’ average funded status deteriorates slightly to 103%
Illustration for a 50/50 fixed income/equity portfolio with a duration of 11 years
U.S. pension plans’ average funded status deteriorates slightly to 103%
As of 09/30/24. Source: S&P, FYE 2023 company reports, Voya IM calculations and 2024 estimates assuming a 50% / 50% split in growth and hedging assets.

1 Growth asset return on the quarter was based on equity return of 7%, hedging assets (which match liability duration) of 5% increase (similar to liabilities, by design), after reflecting benefit payments and timing netted a 3.8% portfolio return. 

2 Liabilities grew 4.4% during the quarter due to a 50 bp decrease in rates with plan duration of 11 years, accounting for service accruals and release from benefits payments.

As of 09/30/24. Source: S&P, FYE 2023 company reports, Voya IM calculations and 2024 estimates assuming a 50% / 50% split in growth and hedging assets.

In the spotlight: Disinversion through an LDI lens

An LDI program is rate agnostic by design. That indifference to rate moves extends to any change across the yield curve. When the key rate duration (KRD) of the hedging asset portfolio is mapped to the KRD of the pension liability profile, movements in the yield curve—whether it be a twist, a steepening, or an inversion—will impact hedging assets and liabilities in the same fashion. In a very real sense, LDI’s alignment of the KRDs immunizes the non-equity portion of the portfolio to rate and curve changes. Thus, in a fully blossomed LDI program, the yield curve’s disinversion is a non-event. 

However, during a yield curve inversion, active investment managers may shift their investment posture in a bid for alpha, buying shorter-duration bonds and locking in the desirable, higher yields. This provides better carry to the portfolio with less volatility than in the long end. This is typically done in tandem with derivatives to manage curve risk and preserve the target interest rate hedge ratio. It may even be done by shifting allocations from growth-seeking assets, as it is comparable to an expected equity return given the current yield environment. 

Irrespective of the capital source, shorter-duration bonds can provide liquidity for benefit payments, functioning like a high-yield checking account. 

Now that the curve has disinverted and may continue to steepen, expect investment managers to reverse course and sell shorter-dated paper as they shift back towards longer-duration bonds to lock in higher yields. All of this is done with an eye towards ensuring the interest rate hedge ratio is not compromised.

U.S. Treasury yield curves
U.S. Treasury yield curves

Notes on the third quarter of 2024

Discount rate decline resulted in deterioration of funded status during Q3. We estimate the average funded status of extant pension plans in the S&P 500 declined from 103.9% to 103.2% during the quarter. A decrease in the discount rate increased liabilities more than was offset by equity returns. 

The 2s-10s Treasury curve disinverted in early September as the 2yr rallied 30 bp. The 10yr UST yield declined 62 bp during the quarter and the 30yr yield was down 38 bp. With the 10yr UST declining more than the 30yr, there was an overall steepening of the previously nearly flat yield curve. 

Credit spreads narrowed slightly, and are at their tightest in decades. The net result of rate and spread movements during the quarter was a 50 bp decrease in the FTSE Pension Discount Rate for short-duration plans. For a plan with a duration of 11 years, this roughly translates to a 5% increase in liabilities due to these changes alone. 

Our representative equity portfolio had a total return of 7%, offsetting liability losses to buoy funded position. For this purpose, we use a mix of S&P 500 (45%), Russell 2000 (25%), MSCI EAFE (20%) and MSCI EM (10%), reflecting the breadth of equity holdings in most plans.

Markets
Markets

Source: FTSE, Barclays Live, ICE Index Platform, S&P, MSCI, Russell. See back page for index definitions. 

3 Based on FTSE’s “short” duration plan, approximately 10.9 years.

Spot rate curves
Spot rate curves

Source: ICE Index Platform, FTSE pension discount curve.

  • The US Treasury spot rate curve is flatter than the FTSE pension discount curve as of 9/30/2024. 
  • For the 15-year tenor, the U.S. Treasury spot rate is the same as of 9/30/2024 vs. 12/31/2023. 
  • However, for the 15-year tenor, the Aa-rated corporate bond spot rate is higher as of 9/30/2024 vs. 12/31/2023.

 

A note about risk 

Examples of LDI (liability-driven investing) performance included in this material are for illustrative purposes only. Liability valuations can increase due to falling interest rates or credit spreads, among other things, as the present value of future obligations increases with falling rates and falling spreads. Liabilities can also increase due to actual demographic experience differing from expected future experience assumed by the plan’s actuary. Diversification neither assures nor guarantees better absolute performance or relative performance versus a pension plan’s liabilities. In addition, investing in alternative investment products such as derivatives can increase the risk and volatility in an investment portfolio. Because investing involves risk to principal, positive results and the achievement of an investor’s goals are not guaranteed. There are no assurances that any investment strategy will be profitable on an absolute basis or relative to the pension plan’s liabilities. Information contained herein should not be construed as comprehensive investment advice. For comprehensive investment advice, please consult a financial professional.

3931717

Past performance is no guarantee of future results. This information is proprietary and cannot be reproduced or distributed. Certain information may be received from sources Voya Investment Management considers reliable; Voya IM does not represent that such information is accurate or complete. Certain statements contained herein may constitute “projections,” “forecasts” and other “forward-looking statements” which do not reflect actual results and are based primarily upon applying retroactively a hypothetical set of assumptions to certain historical financial data. Actual results, performance or events may differ materially from those in such statements. Any opinions, projections, forecasts and forward-looking statements presented herein are valid only as of the date of this document and are subject to change. Nothing contained herein should be construed as (i) an offer to buy any security or (ii) a recommendation as to the advisability of investing in, purchasing or selling any security. Voya IM assumes no obligation to update any forward-looking information. The opinions, views and information expressed in this presentation regarding holdings are subject to change without notice. The information provided regarding holdings is not a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Portfolio holdings are fluid and are subject to daily change based on market conditions and other factors.

Index definitions 

Index returns do not reflect fees, brokerage commissions, taxes or other expenses of investing. Investors cannot invest directly in an index. The FTSE Pension Liability Index reflects the discount rate that can be used to value liabilities for GAAP reporting purposes. Created in 1994, it is a trusted source for plan sponsors and actuaries to value defined benefit pension liabilities in compliance with the SEC’s and FASB’s requirements on the establishment of a discount rate. The index also provides an investment performance benchmark for asset/liability management. By monitoring the index’s returns over time, investors can gauge changes in the value of pension liabilities. The ICE BofA AAA–A U.S. Corporate Index is a subset of the ICE BofA U.S. Corporate Master Index, which tracks the performance of USD-denominated investment grade rated corporate debt publicly issued in the U.S. domestic market. This subset includes all securities with a given investment grade rating of AAA through A. The Bloomberg U.S. Long Credit Index represents the long component of the Bloomberg U.S. Credit Index, which includes publicly issued U.S. corporate and specified foreign debentures and secured notes that meet specified maturity, liquidity and quality requirements. The Bloomberg U.S. Long Government/Credit Index represents the long component of the Bloomberg U.S. Government/Credit Index, which includes Treasuries, agencies and publicly issued U.S. corporate and foreign debentures and secured notes that meet specified maturity, liquidity and quality requirements. The S&P 500 Index consists of approximately 500 leading U.S. companies with approximately 75% coverage of the U.S. stock market capitalization. The Russell 2000 Index measures the performance of the small cap segment of the U.S. equity universe. The MSCI EAFE Index captures the performance of large and mid cap stocks across 21 developed market countries excluding the U.S. and Canada. The MSCI Emerging Markets Index captures the performance of large and mid cap stocks across 24 emerging market countries. 

Canada: Voya Investment Management Co. LLC (“Voya IM”) is relying on an exemption from the adviser registration requirement contained in section 8.26 of NI 31-103 in the provinces of Ontario, Québec and Nova Scotia. Please note that: (i) Voya IM is not registered in Ontario, Québec or Nova Scotia to act as an adviser, (ii) Voya IM’s principal place of business is located in the City of New York, N.Y., U.S.A., (iii) all or substantially all of Voya IM’s assets may be situated outside of Canada, (iv) there may be difficulty enforcing legal rights against Voya IM because of the above, and (v) Voya IM has appointed McMillan LLP as agent for service of process in Ontario (c/o Leila Rafi, Brookfield Place, 181 Bay Street, Suite 4400, Toronto, Ontario M5J 2T3), and Québec (c/o Enda Wong, 1000 Sherbrooke Street West, Suite 2700, Montreal, Québec H3A 3G4), and Stewart McKelvey as agent for service of process in Nova Scotia (c/o Marc Reardon, Queen’s Marque, 600-1741 Lower Water Street, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 0J2).

Top